Barthes’ Irreversible Codes: An Intertextual Reading of James Joyce’s “Araby”

Seyed Ali Booryazadeh, Sohila Faghfori

Abstract


Roland Barthes believes that semiology is the study of how language embodies the world. Semiotic codes, the paths of this embodiment, accordingly arouse his attention. Barthes in a structural analysis of Balzac’s “Sarrasine” in S/Z expounds five types and functions of these codes: proairetic (basic narrative actions); hermeneutic (narrative turning points); cultural (prior social knowledge); semic (medium-related codes) and symbolic (themes). This research in a parallel manner explicates that “Araby,” one of the most widely read of James Joyce’s short stories, is abounded with two of these irreversible codes (proairetic and hermeneutic). The present study furthermore tries to show how with resort to a series of signs and the idea of intertextuality a literary text can provide probable answers for some ambiguous and questionable lexias that comprise the story’s hermeneutic code. It demonstrates that not only can the text of “Araby” be encoded by the same criteria Barthes encoded “Sarrasine” but also Joyce himself presents particular names for these codes.

 


Keywords


Semiology, hermeneutic code, proairetic code, intertextuality, gnomon, simony, Araby, Dubliners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrams, M. H. (1990). A Glossary of Literary Terms. London: Thomas Heinle.

Alighieri, D. (1996). The Divine Comedy (Robert M. Durling, Trans.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image–Music–Text. London: Fontana Press.

Barthes, R. (1990). S/Z (Richard Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.

Boysen, B. (2008). The Necropolis of Love: James Joyce’s Dubliners. Neohelicon 36 (1), 157-169.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The Basics. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Bulson, E. (2006). The Cambridge Introduction to James Joyce. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Collins, B. L. (1968). “Araby” and the Extended Similie. In Peter K. Garrett (Ed.), Twentieth Century Interpretations of Dubliners (93-99) Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the study of Literature. London and New York, NY: Routledge.

Doloff, S. (1995). Aspects of Milton’s Paradise Lost in James Joyce’s “Araby.” James Joyce Quarterly, 33 (1), 113-115.

Ghahreman, O. (2013). James Joyce’s “An Encounter”: From the Perversion of an Escape to the Perversion of the Fatherhood. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2 (2), 158-164.

Haskins, S. (1995). Mary Magdalene Myth and Metaphor. New York, NY: The Berkley Publishing Croup.

Herring, P. F. (1987). Joyce’s Uncertainty Principle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Joyce, J. (2005). Dubliners, Webster’s Thesaurus (Ed.). San Diego: ICON Group International, Inc.

Joyce, J. (1944). Stephan Hero. London: Jonathan Cape Limited.

Robinson, D.W. (1987). The Narration of Reading in Joyce’s “The Sisters,” “An Encounter,” and “Araby.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language, 29 (4), 377-396.

Scholes, R. (1982). Semiotics and Interpretation. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

Waugh, P. (2006). Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.1p.137

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2012-2021 (CC-BY) Australian International Academic Centre PTY.LTD

International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the journal emails into your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders.